Extensive heterogeneity in the expression of steroid receptors in superficial peritoneal endometriotic lesions.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the expression of steroid hormone receptors (oestrogen receptor-α and progesterone receptor A/B) and proliferative markers (Bcl-2 and Ki67) uniform among superficial peritoneal endometriotic lesions? DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of 24 patients with surgically and histologically confirmed endometriosis. Immunofluorescence was used to determine the proportion of oestrogen receptor-α (ERα), progesterone receptor A/B, Bcl-2 and Ki67 positive cells in 271 endometriotic lesions (defined as endometriotic gland profile/s within an individual region of CD10 stromal immunostaining from a single biopsy) from 67 endometriotic biopsies from 24 patients. Data were analysed to examine associations related to menstrual cycle stage, lesion location and gland morphology. RESULTS: Oestrogen receptor-α and progesterone receptor A/B expression in superficial peritoneal endometriotic lesions was extremely heterogeneous. Bcl-2 immunostaining in endometriotic lesions was also variable, whereas Ki67 immunostaining was minimal. Menstrual cycle stage associations were limited in steroid hormone receptor and Bcl-2 expression in lesions. Patterns in progesterone receptor A/B and Bcl-2 immunostaining were associated with lesion location. Bcl-2 was differentially expressed, based on lesion gland morphology. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate considerable diversity in the expression of steroid hormone receptors and Bcl-2 between lesions, even within an individual patient.

Comparing endometriotic lesions with eutopic endometrium: time to shift focus?

Endometriosis is a heterogeneous disease in terms of patient symptoms, treatment responsiveness and the presentation of endometriotic lesions. This article explores the histological features of endometriotic lesions, highlighting their sometimes underappreciated heterogeneity. We note the variability in evidence for and against the menstrual cycle responsiveness of lesions and consider the utility of drawing parallels between endometriotic lesions and eutopic endometrium. We ask whether histopathologic features beyond just the presence/absence of endometrial-like glands and/or stroma could help improve disease stratification. At the same time, we acknowledge the desire of many clinicians and patients to avoid invasive surgery thereby limiting the ability to histologically phenotype lesions. The ability to derive clinically useful histological information from endometriotic lesions, in association with patient data, would be invaluable to clinicians to help improve treatment options in such a diverse group of patients. However, in suggesting that a shift in focus may enable the development of a better patient stratification system, we recognise that our wish for a single comprehensive stratification system may be beyond reach for a disease of such diverse presentation.